The links should now be working on the Module 7 assignment.
REVISED Module 7 Prompt:
1.Pew Research Study: https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2015/05/12/americas-changing-religious-landscape/
1. Using that study, locate a specific state of the US and examine a religious trend within that region.
2. As you examine its trends, what is significant about that region’s results?
3. Using the survey questionnaire, what kind of questions reflect why you found this region worth discussing on this response?
2. Link to the study’s questionnaire: II (pewforum.org)
3. Link to demographic info: https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/religious-landscape-study/
4. Upload to Canvas by 11:59 pm on Sunday 10/6/24
GENERAL RESPONSE CRITERIA:
1. The response must be at least 300 words (approximately 1 full page) and demonstrate course-related knowledge.
2. Provide multiple citations from the course textbook.
1. Cite Hark. Cite Hark again. Cite Hark like a fanboy/girl.
3. The response requires academic writing style and formatting that corresponds with your particular discipline.
4. This should be a double-spaced document written in Times New Roman 12-point font.
Top 10 Ways To Avoid Losing Points On A RSCH201 Writing Assignment
Keep this list handy while writing your paper:
Early on, mention the author’s full name(s) the first time that you mention them. A last name can be used afterwards.
Early on, provide the full name of the main reference article. Afterwards, “the study” or “the research” or a shortened version like “in Unaware…”
Provide Hark tie-ins and citations. This is a freebie and absolutely necessary.
References must include the main article, Hark and any other sources if required (usually not required).
Follow format instructions – font size, spacing etc… Make sure you have the proper heading / cover page (name, date etc…)
Word counts are a minimum. Quality beats quantity, but minimums will help you with quality. Provide this number at the end of your response – without title page or references.
Avoid personal references (“I think…”) in an academic context unless the prompt specifically asks what you think.
Do not judge or provide a critique of the research unless you have standing to do so. Are you competent in this field?
Avoid too much detail in the data – this can be found in the paper and does not have to be listed in your response – unless you are making a very specific point.
Answer the prompts point by point. This is what you will be graded on. Did you fully answer the queries?